Validación de un cuestionario para la medición del clima organizacional en centros de salud.

J. F. Menárguez Puche, Pedro Jesus Saturno Hernandez, A. López Santiago

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

5 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

OBJECTIVE: To check the reliability and to analyse the validity of a questionnaire on organisational atmosphere (OA). DESIGN: Crossover and observational. SETTING: Primary care teams (PCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Two questionnaires were offered to all the doctors, nurses and social workers (548 professionals) from the 29 PCTs in an autonomous community. One questionnaire was on the OA and the other was a subjective assessment of satisfaction with the structure and functioning of their own team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: When the results were analysed (initial factorial analysis), 3 items with only slight discrimination were eliminated from the OA questionnaire. Construction validity (factorial analysis with varimax method), reliability of the questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient) and of criterion (correlation between OA and variables in the subjective assessment questionnaire) were calculated. The overall response rate was 77.5% (402 professionals). Three dimensions which explained 57% of total variability and which confirmed adequate construction validity were identified: team-work, cohesion and commitment. "Team-work" comprised 9 items and explained 27.18% of total variability. "Cohesion" had 7 items, which explained 16.55% of variability. Lastly, "Commitment" explained 13.47% of variability, with 5 items. The validity of criterion was adequate (close correlation between OA and subjective assessment of structure and operation). Reliability was high (0.89 alpha and 0.92 Spearman-Brown for the entire questionnaire and > 0.7 for the dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the adapted questionnaire are sufficient and permit its routine primary care use in our health system to be recommended.

Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)192-197
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónAtencion primaria / Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria
Volumen23
N.º4
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 1999

Huella dactilar

Atmosphere
Health
Primary Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Nurses

Citar esto

@article{5009f47cc1f24cac972c508d622f5a8e,
title = "Validaci{\'o}n de un cuestionario para la medici{\'o}n del clima organizacional en centros de salud.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To check the reliability and to analyse the validity of a questionnaire on organisational atmosphere (OA). DESIGN: Crossover and observational. SETTING: Primary care teams (PCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Two questionnaires were offered to all the doctors, nurses and social workers (548 professionals) from the 29 PCTs in an autonomous community. One questionnaire was on the OA and the other was a subjective assessment of satisfaction with the structure and functioning of their own team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: When the results were analysed (initial factorial analysis), 3 items with only slight discrimination were eliminated from the OA questionnaire. Construction validity (factorial analysis with varimax method), reliability of the questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient) and of criterion (correlation between OA and variables in the subjective assessment questionnaire) were calculated. The overall response rate was 77.5{\%} (402 professionals). Three dimensions which explained 57{\%} of total variability and which confirmed adequate construction validity were identified: team-work, cohesion and commitment. {"}Team-work{"} comprised 9 items and explained 27.18{\%} of total variability. {"}Cohesion{"} had 7 items, which explained 16.55{\%} of variability. Lastly, {"}Commitment{"} explained 13.47{\%} of variability, with 5 items. The validity of criterion was adequate (close correlation between OA and subjective assessment of structure and operation). Reliability was high (0.89 alpha and 0.92 Spearman-Brown for the entire questionnaire and > 0.7 for the dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the adapted questionnaire are sufficient and permit its routine primary care use in our health system to be recommended.",
author = "{Men{\'a}rguez Puche}, {J. F.} and {Saturno Hernandez}, {Pedro Jesus} and {L{\'o}pez Santiago}, A.",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "Espa{\~n}ol",
volume = "23",
pages = "192--197",
journal = "Atencion primaria / Sociedad Espa{\~n}ola de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria",
issn = "0212-6567",
publisher = "Ediciones Doyma, S.L.",
number = "4",

}

Validación de un cuestionario para la medición del clima organizacional en centros de salud. / Menárguez Puche, J. F.; Saturno Hernandez, Pedro Jesus; López Santiago, A.

En: Atencion primaria / Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria, Vol. 23, N.º 4, 01.01.1999, p. 192-197.

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validación de un cuestionario para la medición del clima organizacional en centros de salud.

AU - Menárguez Puche, J. F.

AU - Saturno Hernandez, Pedro Jesus

AU - López Santiago, A.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To check the reliability and to analyse the validity of a questionnaire on organisational atmosphere (OA). DESIGN: Crossover and observational. SETTING: Primary care teams (PCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Two questionnaires were offered to all the doctors, nurses and social workers (548 professionals) from the 29 PCTs in an autonomous community. One questionnaire was on the OA and the other was a subjective assessment of satisfaction with the structure and functioning of their own team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: When the results were analysed (initial factorial analysis), 3 items with only slight discrimination were eliminated from the OA questionnaire. Construction validity (factorial analysis with varimax method), reliability of the questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient) and of criterion (correlation between OA and variables in the subjective assessment questionnaire) were calculated. The overall response rate was 77.5% (402 professionals). Three dimensions which explained 57% of total variability and which confirmed adequate construction validity were identified: team-work, cohesion and commitment. "Team-work" comprised 9 items and explained 27.18% of total variability. "Cohesion" had 7 items, which explained 16.55% of variability. Lastly, "Commitment" explained 13.47% of variability, with 5 items. The validity of criterion was adequate (close correlation between OA and subjective assessment of structure and operation). Reliability was high (0.89 alpha and 0.92 Spearman-Brown for the entire questionnaire and > 0.7 for the dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the adapted questionnaire are sufficient and permit its routine primary care use in our health system to be recommended.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To check the reliability and to analyse the validity of a questionnaire on organisational atmosphere (OA). DESIGN: Crossover and observational. SETTING: Primary care teams (PCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Two questionnaires were offered to all the doctors, nurses and social workers (548 professionals) from the 29 PCTs in an autonomous community. One questionnaire was on the OA and the other was a subjective assessment of satisfaction with the structure and functioning of their own team. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: When the results were analysed (initial factorial analysis), 3 items with only slight discrimination were eliminated from the OA questionnaire. Construction validity (factorial analysis with varimax method), reliability of the questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient) and of criterion (correlation between OA and variables in the subjective assessment questionnaire) were calculated. The overall response rate was 77.5% (402 professionals). Three dimensions which explained 57% of total variability and which confirmed adequate construction validity were identified: team-work, cohesion and commitment. "Team-work" comprised 9 items and explained 27.18% of total variability. "Cohesion" had 7 items, which explained 16.55% of variability. Lastly, "Commitment" explained 13.47% of variability, with 5 items. The validity of criterion was adequate (close correlation between OA and subjective assessment of structure and operation). Reliability was high (0.89 alpha and 0.92 Spearman-Brown for the entire questionnaire and > 0.7 for the dimensions). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the adapted questionnaire are sufficient and permit its routine primary care use in our health system to be recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033558527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artículo

C2 - 10333602

AN - SCOPUS:0033558527

VL - 23

SP - 192

EP - 197

JO - Atencion primaria / Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria

JF - Atencion primaria / Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria

SN - 0212-6567

IS - 4

ER -